Quick Answer


The EB-1A "extraordinary ability" green card requires meeting 3 out of 10 evidence-based criteria set by USCIS. Most qualified immigrants misunderstand what "meeting" a criterion means, leading to weak applications or years of delay.


The gap isn't ability - it's knowing which 3 criteria fit your profile and how to prove them with third-party evidence.

Key Takeaways


The 3-of-10 framework is literal

You must satisfy at least 3 of USCIS's 10 criteria, or prove a one-time major achievement like an Oscar, Pulitzer, Nobel, Olympic medal, etc.


"Meeting" means proving with evidence

A criterion isn't met because you've done something impressive - you need credible, third-party documentation that fits USCIS's definition.


Not all criteria are equal for your field

Some criteria work for researchers; others work better for business or tech professionals.


Partial evidence doesn't count

USCIS evaluates on a met/not met basis per criterion. Strong evidence for 2 criteria and weak evidence for 5 others equals denial.


Most qualified immigrants already meet 2-3 criteria

The gap isn't ability, it's awareness of what counts and how to document it.

Key Takeaways


The 3-of-10 framework is literal

You must satisfy at least 3 of USCIS's 10 criteria, or prove a one-time major achievement like an Oscar, Pulitzer, Nobel, Olympic medal, etc.


"Meeting" means proving with evidence

A criterion isn't met because you've done something impressive - you need credible, third-party documentation that fits USCIS's definition.


Not all criteria are equal for your field

Some criteria work for researchers; others work better for business or tech professionals.


Partial evidence doesn't count

USCIS evaluates on a met/not met basis per criterion. Strong evidence for 2 criteria and weak evidence for 5 others equals denial.


Most qualified immigrants already meet 2-3 criteria

The gap isn't ability, it's awareness of what counts and how to document it.

Table of Content

What Is the EB-1A "3 Out of 10" Rule?

The EB-1A visa is a green card pathway for immigrants with "extraordinary ability" in science, arts, education, business, or athletics. Unlike most U.S. visas, EB-1A doesn't require an employer sponsor or a U.S. job offer. You petition for yourself.


To prove extraordinary ability, you must meet at least 3 of the following 10 criteria:

  1. Awards or prizes for excellence

  2. Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievement

  3. Published material about you in major media

  4. Judging the work of others

  5. Original contributions of major significance

  6. Authorship of scholarly articles

  7. Display of your work at exhibitions

  8. Leading or critical role in distinguished organizations

  9. High salary relative to others in your field

  10. Commercial success in performing arts


For most applicants, the path is the 3-of-10 route. But meeting a criterion isn't about what you've done, it's about what you can prove with third-party evidence that fits USCIS's specific interpretation.


Why the Traditional Approach Falls Short

Most qualified immigrants approach EB-1A in broken ways:


The "I'll Apply When I'm Ready" Trap

High achievers assume they need to be more famous before they qualify. They delay for years, not realizing they already meet 3 criteria - they just don't know how to frame or document it.


The Generic Attorney Assessment

Many attorneys offer surface-level reviews without explaining what type of awards count, which publications matter, or how to structure evidence. Clients get vague encouragement or discouraging rejections without actionable guidance.


The Resume-Dump Application

Some treat EB-1A like a job application: list every credential and hope something sticks. But USCIS evaluates criterion by criterion. A 50-page CV with no clear structure or mapping often results in denial.


How OpenSphere Changes the Process

OpenSphere treats EB-1A eligibility as a structured, evidence-based evaluation:


Criterion-by-Criterion Assessment

We walk you through each of the 10 criteria with plain and simple English definitions. You answer targeted questions, and the system matches your achievements to specific criteria in real time.


Clear Answer for Meeting Criterion

For each criterion, OpenSphere gives you clear status. This removes ambiguity, making sure you know exactly where you stand.


Evidence Gap Identification

If you partially meet a criterion, we tell you what's missing. For example: "You've been quoted in TechCrunch, but USCIS prefers coverage about you, not quotes from you."


The Final Merits Determination Preview

Meeting 3 criteria is necessary but not sufficient. USCIS evaluates whether your evidence proves you're "at the top of your field." To handle this, we help you build a narrative thread across your criteria, reinforcing your ability.


Field-Specific Guidance

Not all criteria work for all fields. OpenSphere adapts based on your industry - researchers focus on original contributions and authorship; tech founders focus on high salary, critical role, and press.


Why This Approach Works


It's Built on USCIS Policy

OpenSphere's criterion definitions come directly from the Kazarian v. USCIS framework and the USCIS Policy Manual, which is the same two-step analysis USCIS officers use.


It Prevents Wasted Time and Money

An EB-1A application costs $15,000–$40,000 in legal fees, plus filing fees. If you apply without meeting 3 criteria clearly, you risk denial. We help you determine whether or not you're ready before you file.


It Turns Uncertainty Into a Roadmap

Most immigrants don't know if they're 6 months or 3 years away from qualifying. With us, you get a timeline and a game plan: "You currently meet 2 criteria strongly. Here's a 12-month plan to reach 3."


The Future of EB-1A Eligibility Assessment

EB-1A has been treated as a "mystery box" visa, all you can do is apply and pray. However, as USCIS standards become more transparent, eligibility should also soon be demystified.

The future is evidence-first immigration planning. Immigrants know which criteria they meet, what gaps exist, and how to close them before spending $20K on an attorney. Attorneys become execution partners, not eligibility gatekeepers.


A Traditional EB-1A Assessment vs OpenSphere's


Dimension

Traditional Approach

OpenSphere's Approach

Eligibility clarity

"You might qualify" or "You need more"

Meets, Partially Meets, or Doesn't Meet for each criterion

Evidence guidance

Generic advice like, "Get recommendation letters"

Specific advice like, "You need 6-8 letters from independent experts attesting to your original contributions"

Timeline

Unclear, could be ready now or in 3 years

Clear, "You meet 2/3 criteria. Here's a 9-month plan for the 3rd."

Field-specific advice

One-size-fits-all

Tailored to your industry

Outcome

Apply and hope, or delay indefinitely

Evidence-backed confidence or roadmap to qualify


Want to know which of the 10 criteria you already meet and what's standing between you and EB-1A eligibility?


Take the OpenSphere EB-1A evaluation. You'll get a criterion-by-criterion breakdown, evidence gap analysis, and a roadmap to qualify.


Start Your EB-1A Evaluation

What Is the EB-1A "3 Out of 10" Rule?

The EB-1A visa is a green card pathway for immigrants with "extraordinary ability" in science, arts, education, business, or athletics. Unlike most U.S. visas, EB-1A doesn't require an employer sponsor or a U.S. job offer. You petition for yourself.


To prove extraordinary ability, you must meet at least 3 of the following 10 criteria:

  1. Awards or prizes for excellence

  2. Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievement

  3. Published material about you in major media

  4. Judging the work of others

  5. Original contributions of major significance

  6. Authorship of scholarly articles

  7. Display of your work at exhibitions

  8. Leading or critical role in distinguished organizations

  9. High salary relative to others in your field

  10. Commercial success in performing arts


For most applicants, the path is the 3-of-10 route. But meeting a criterion isn't about what you've done, it's about what you can prove with third-party evidence that fits USCIS's specific interpretation.


Why the Traditional Approach Falls Short

Most qualified immigrants approach EB-1A in broken ways:


The "I'll Apply When I'm Ready" Trap

High achievers assume they need to be more famous before they qualify. They delay for years, not realizing they already meet 3 criteria - they just don't know how to frame or document it.


The Generic Attorney Assessment

Many attorneys offer surface-level reviews without explaining what type of awards count, which publications matter, or how to structure evidence. Clients get vague encouragement or discouraging rejections without actionable guidance.


The Resume-Dump Application

Some treat EB-1A like a job application: list every credential and hope something sticks. But USCIS evaluates criterion by criterion. A 50-page CV with no clear structure or mapping often results in denial.


How OpenSphere Changes the Process

OpenSphere treats EB-1A eligibility as a structured, evidence-based evaluation:


Criterion-by-Criterion Assessment

We walk you through each of the 10 criteria with plain and simple English definitions. You answer targeted questions, and the system matches your achievements to specific criteria in real time.


Clear Answer for Meeting Criterion

For each criterion, OpenSphere gives you clear status. This removes ambiguity, making sure you know exactly where you stand.


Evidence Gap Identification

If you partially meet a criterion, we tell you what's missing. For example: "You've been quoted in TechCrunch, but USCIS prefers coverage about you, not quotes from you."


The Final Merits Determination Preview

Meeting 3 criteria is necessary but not sufficient. USCIS evaluates whether your evidence proves you're "at the top of your field." To handle this, we help you build a narrative thread across your criteria, reinforcing your ability.


Field-Specific Guidance

Not all criteria work for all fields. OpenSphere adapts based on your industry - researchers focus on original contributions and authorship; tech founders focus on high salary, critical role, and press.


Why This Approach Works


It's Built on USCIS Policy

OpenSphere's criterion definitions come directly from the Kazarian v. USCIS framework and the USCIS Policy Manual, which is the same two-step analysis USCIS officers use.


It Prevents Wasted Time and Money

An EB-1A application costs $15,000–$40,000 in legal fees, plus filing fees. If you apply without meeting 3 criteria clearly, you risk denial. We help you determine whether or not you're ready before you file.


It Turns Uncertainty Into a Roadmap

Most immigrants don't know if they're 6 months or 3 years away from qualifying. With us, you get a timeline and a game plan: "You currently meet 2 criteria strongly. Here's a 12-month plan to reach 3."


The Future of EB-1A Eligibility Assessment

EB-1A has been treated as a "mystery box" visa, all you can do is apply and pray. However, as USCIS standards become more transparent, eligibility should also soon be demystified.

The future is evidence-first immigration planning. Immigrants know which criteria they meet, what gaps exist, and how to close them before spending $20K on an attorney. Attorneys become execution partners, not eligibility gatekeepers.


A Traditional EB-1A Assessment vs OpenSphere's


Dimension

Traditional Approach

OpenSphere's Approach

Eligibility clarity

"You might qualify" or "You need more"

Meets, Partially Meets, or Doesn't Meet for each criterion

Evidence guidance

Generic advice like, "Get recommendation letters"

Specific advice like, "You need 6-8 letters from independent experts attesting to your original contributions"

Timeline

Unclear, could be ready now or in 3 years

Clear, "You meet 2/3 criteria. Here's a 9-month plan for the 3rd."

Field-specific advice

One-size-fits-all

Tailored to your industry

Outcome

Apply and hope, or delay indefinitely

Evidence-backed confidence or roadmap to qualify


Want to know which of the 10 criteria you already meet and what's standing between you and EB-1A eligibility?


Take the OpenSphere EB-1A evaluation. You'll get a criterion-by-criterion breakdown, evidence gap analysis, and a roadmap to qualify.


Start Your EB-1A Evaluation

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Do I really only need 3 out of 10 criteria?

Yes. USCIS explicitly requires 3, not 10. Each criterion has a high evidence bar, and after meeting 3, USCIS evaluates whether your overall case proves extraordinary ability.

2. Can I meet the same criterion multiple times?

No. If you have 10 awards, that's still just 1 criterion. You need to satisfy 3 different categories of evidence.

3. What if I meet 2 criteria strongly but only partially meet a 3rd?

USCIS evaluates on a met/not met basis. Partial evidence typically doesn't count. You'd need to strengthen that 3rd criterion or pursue a different one.

4. Which 3 criteria are easiest to meet?

It depends on your field. For researchers: judging, authorship, original contributions. For founders: high salary, critical role, press. For creatives: display of work, awards, commercial success.

5. I have a PhD and 20 publications. Am I automatically qualified?

Not necessarily. Publications fall under 1 criterion (authorship). You'd still need 2 more. A PhD alone doesn't prove extraordinary ability—USCIS wants evidence of acclaim beyond typical academic achievement.

6. Can I apply for EB-1A while on an H-1B or F-1?

Yes. EB-1A is a self-petition, so your current visa status doesn't restrict you.

7. How long does it take to go from 2 criteria to 3?

It depends on the criterion. Judging experience or press coverage can be achieved in 6-12 months with the right strategy.

8. What's the difference between EB-1A and O-1A?

EB-1A is a green card (permanent residence). O-1A is a temporary work visa. Both use similar criteria, but EB-1A has a higher evidence bar.

9. Do I need an attorney to apply for EB-1A?

Most applicants work with an attorney because the petition requires legal precision. However, understanding eligibility before hiring an attorney saves time and money.

10. What happens if I meet 3 criteria but USCIS still denies me?

This happens at the "final merits determination" stage. USCIS may argue your evidence doesn't prove you're at the "top of your field." This is why narrative structure and evidence quality matter as much as meeting the criteria.

Share post

Explore Topics

Icon

0%

Explore Topics

Icon

0%